Login | Register Now | Contact Us   
 

Finance Bill, 2014 enacted into Finance Act, 2014, Date of Enactment 06.08.2014Budget 2014-15 : Sale of space for advertising has been made taxable except for print media.Budget 2014-15 : Radio Taxis are now taxable.Budget 2014-15 : Education : The definition of Auxiliary Education Services has been scraped.Budget 2014-15 : Works Contract : 2 slab rates prescribed in place of earlier 3 slabs.Budget 2014-15 : E-payment of Service tax is being made mandatory with effect from 01.10.2014.Budget 2014-15 : POPS: Definition of intermediary is being amended to include the intermediary of goods in its scope.

Recent Important Case laws
Service TaxCentral ExciseCustomsSer
More Case Laws...
STO 2014 CESTAT 105
[Date of Order: 2014-01-21]

Mandap Keeper Service: Room charges: On the basis of earlier Order of Tribunal: Pre deposit condition waived.

Free Preview
STO 2014 CESTAT 104
[Date of Order: 2014-01-22]

C&F Agent Service: Valuation: Demurrage/wharfage charges charged by the railways and expenses on local transport, the respondent have acted only as agent of PCL and, as such, the expenses for these items reimbursed to them on actual basis by their principal - PCL would be not includible in the assessable value of the C&F agent services provided by them.

Free Preview
STO 2014 CESTAT 103
[Date of Order: 2014-01-22]

Tour Operator: Since during the period of dispute, a person operating touring a contract carriage, not covered by the definition of 'Tourist Vehicle', was not covered and only the persons operating tours in tourist vehicles covered by definition of "Tour Operator", the respondent, in this case, who were operating tours in the vehicles, which were not the tourist vehicles in terms of Section 2(43) of the Motor Vehicle Act, read with the Rule 128 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, would not be covered by the definition of "Tour Operator”.

Free Preview
STO 2014 CESTAT 101
[Date of Order: 2014-01-02]

Refund: Unjust enrichment: Sufficient material is on record to show that the appellant had paid the service tax out of its own pocket in respect of exempted service and the appellant had not passed on the burden of tax so deposited with the Revenue, on the service receiver: Appellants entitled for the refund.

Free Preview
STO 2014 CESTAT 100
[Date of Order: 2014-01-07]

Penalty: Section 76 & 78: Penalty under section 78 not contested: Penalty under Section 76 set aside as there was sufficient cause for non deposit of tax.

Free Preview
More Case Laws...
 
 

www.centralexciseonline.com

 


www.taxolegal.com


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


www.customsindiaonline.com
Home | Mission | Contact Us | Acknowledgements © 2009 Copyrights, All Rights Reserved. 
Disclaimer Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order and other contents correctly, the access and circulation is subject to the condition that EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions. The Site is constantly updated and any or all of the contents are liable to be modified, altered, deleted or replaced. EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone whether directly or indirectly  due to any modification , alteration, addition, deletion or replacement of any of the contents.

Copyright : Reproduction of news articles, photos, or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of  EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is prohibited.Do not copy contents of this site . All pages are protected by COPYSCAPE. Plagiarism will be detected by COPYSCAPE.