Login | Register Now | Contact Us   
 

Budget 15-16 proposals: Amendments in sections 73, 76 and 78 (all related to penalty)Budget 15-16 proposals: Insertion of transition provision by way of section 78BBudget 15-16 proposals: Omitting section 80 (provided for waiver of penalty)Extending the scope of advance rulings to resident firms, with immediate effect (from 1.3.2015)Amendment in reverse charge mechanism, with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015)To prescribe full reverse charge on manpower supply and security service provided by individual, HUF, partnership firm to a body corporate, with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015)Prescribing reverse charge on service provided by a mutual fund agent, mutual fund distributor and agents of lottery distributor, with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015)Amendments in section 86 (remedy against the order passed by commissioner (Appeals) in a matter involving rebate of service tax shall lie in terms of section 35 EE of the Central Excise Act)Amendments in the provisions relating to Settlement CommissionShifting the liability of payment of service tax on aggregator of a service where service is provided under the brand name of the aggregator, with immediate effect (from 1.3.2015)Amendments in rules 4 (prescribing documentation, time limit and procedure for registration)Registration for single premises shall be granted within two days of filing the applicationProvisions for issuing digitally signed invoices and maintaining of records in electronic form added in rules 4A and 5 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, with immediate effect (from 1.3.2015)The period for taking Cenvat Credit is being extended from six months from the date of invoice to one year from the date of invoice.Cenvat Credit allowed on input and capital goods received directly by job workers. ‘Export goods’ and ‘Exempt goods’ defined. New exemptions for,- (a) Precondition, pre-cooling, ripening, waxing, retail packing, labeling of fruits and vegetables (b) Service by a Common Effluent Treatment Plant operator (c) Varistha Bima Yojana (d) Ambulance services (e) Admission to a museum, zoo, national park, wild life sanctuary, and a tiger reserve (f) Service provided by exhibitor of movie to a distributor or an AOP consisting of exhibitor as one of its member (g)Transport of export goods by road from the place of removal to a laChange in abatement rates and conditions thereof for transport of passengers and goods by train; transport of goods by road by a GTA; transport of goods by vessels; executive/business class travel by air; and withdrawal of abatement on services provided in relation to chit, with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015) Amendment in reverse charge mechanism, with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015) To prescribe full reverse charge on manpower supply and security service provided by individual, HUF, partnership firm to a body corporate, with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015) Prescribing reverse charge on service provided by a mutual fund agent, mutual fund distributor and agents of lottery distributor, with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015)Amendment in rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules to allow credit of service tax paid by recipient of service in partial reverse charge immediately on payment of tax ,with immediate effect (from 1.4.2015)Service Tax to be levied on service by way of access to amusement facility (amusement parks, water parks , theme parks etc)Service Tax rate is increased from 12.36% to 14%. New rate shall come into effect after the enactment of the Finance Bill, 2015. Notification No. 42/2012-ST is being rescindedSwachh Bharat Cess- Govt. to impose cess on all or any taxable service at the rate of 2% of the value of taxable serviceWe are committed to implementing a state of the art indirect tax system, the Goods and Services Tax, from April 1, 2016 - Finance MinisterNow issuing of Digital Invoices recognised in Service Tax.The term “government” defined Section 65B(26A)Section 80 providing waiver from penalty is proposed to be omitted.
Import of Services: U-turn in Reverse Charge Mechanism
28 July, 2010 :
Import of Services: U-turn in Reverse Charge Mechanism

Taxing the Services, which are imported in the country, is not as uncomplicated as Taxing the Goods when imported through any port . It has been a Complex mechanism when it comes to making a decision, under what circumstances an Imported Service is to be Tax or otherwise . The logic of levying such tax was simple, on imported goods there are variety of Custom Duties levied, thus, import of Service should be also be taxed to Service Tax , however its easier said than done. Service is a non-tangible thing in contrast to Goods. The Recipient of Service is made liable to pay Service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism. However, the effective date of the Taxing the imported services in the reverse charge method have always been under dispute.

The Dispute related to the effective date came up before Larger Bench of Tribunal which held in case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur - STO 2008 CESTAT 321 that Service recipient not liable to pay Service tax prior to 1-1-2005 for service provided from outside India. The Department went in appeal to the Supreme Court and their appeal was dismissed. The controversy appeared to be set at rest with the decision of the Bombay High Court in Indian National Shipowners Association (INSA) Vs. Union of India - STO 2009 Bom 78, wherein the High Court held that Statutory provision for taxing were absent before enactment of Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994. Thus, Recipient in India is liable to Service tax for service received from abroad only from 18.04.2006. The department again went for an appeal to the Supreme Court. Once again SLP No.18932 / 2009 filed by UOI against the said judgment was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 14.12.2009.

Surprisingly the issue of effective date of such tax continued to bother the policy makers in CBEC and they came out with a Instruction for Service Tax department.The Commissioner (Legal) vide departmental instruction issued from F.No.275/7/2010-CX.8A Dated : 30.06.2010 has addressed the issue in detail. Wherein it has been stated that, the aforementioned judgment in the case of M/s. INSA Vs. Union of India does not apply to the cases where taxable service, provided by a non-resident, not having any office / establishment in India, is received in India. The CBEC further states that the levy of Service Tax on such services has been examined in the cases of (i) M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur, by the larger Bench of CESTAT STO 2008 CESTAT 321 and (ii) UOI Vs. M/s. Aditya Cement, by the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan, STO 2008 Raj 19 wherein it has been held that Service Tax liability on services received in India from a non resident arises w.e.f. from 1.1.2005, consequent upon issuance of Notification No. 36/2004-ST, dated 31.12.2004, under section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with rule 2(1)(d)(iv) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. In view of the above, as per the CBEC directives ,the field formations are directed to defend the view that the levy of service tax on taxable services received in India from a non-resident, not having any office in India, arises on reverse charge basis, w.e.f. 01.01.2005 as has been upheld by the Court in the cases M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd and M/s. Aditya Cement Ltd., distinguishing such cases on facts from the INSA case.

In view of the above, as per the latest Instruction dated 30.6.2010 the accepted position is that, in case of taxable service provided by a non-resident, not having office / establishment in India, and received in India, the service tax liability arises w.e.f. 01.01.2005, on reverse charge basis on the recipient of service in India. Therefore, the overall facts and circumstances of each case needs to be taken into account to determine whether service is received in India or otherwise. And that , in case of taxable service received outside India by a person, who is resident in India or has place of business/business establishment in India, the service tax liability arises w.e.f. 18.04.2006, as is in the case of INSA, where services were received outside India for use in the ships and vessels located outside India.

Further the instruction clarifies that the ratio decidendi of aforementioned judgment in the case of M/s. INSA appears to have applied wrongly in a few subsequent cases by the Courts to arrive at the conclusion that service tax would not be leviable before 18.04.2006, even on services received in India, when provided by a non-resident. One such case is M/s. Unitech vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi STO 2009 Del 877, wherein Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, applying the ratio of M/s. INSA case has held that service tax liability on the architectural service provided by a non-resident to M/s. Unitech in India would arise w.e.f.18.04.2006. This order has not been accepted, as Department is of the view that service tax liability in such cases arises w.e.f 1.1.2005, on reverse charge basis, in view of the ratio laid down in the aforementioned cases of M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd and M/s. Aditya Cement. Accordingly, an SLP has been filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this case.

In view of the above, the field formations are directed by department to defend the view that the levy of Service Tax on taxable services received in India from a non-resident, not having any office in India, arises on reverse charge basis, w.e.f. 01.01.2005 as has been upheld by the Apex Court in the cases M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd and M/s. Aditya Cement Ltd., distinguishing such cases on facts from the INSA case. However, levy of service tax in respect of cases where service is received outside India would follow the ratio in the aforementioned case of M/s. INSA vs UOI. Further department has instructed officers to critically examine the pending disputes as to whether the service was received in India or outside India and appropriate action may please be taken for resolution of such disputes.

Thus, now CBEC is trying to kick hornet’s nest by raising a new controversy for a position that was settled by the Apex Court . Undoubtedly. a spree of show cause notices and consequent litigations are at the doorstep of importer of Services. It is a complete U turn by the Department and that too in reverse gear when it comes to Service Tax Reverse Charge Mechanism.

Import of Services

Courtesy: From the desk of Monish Bhalla, Founder, www.servicetaxonline.com
Related Contents
  • Import of Services (Applicable upto 30th June, 2012)
  •  
     

    www.centralexciseonline.com

     


    www.taxolegal.com


    Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


    www.customsindiaonline.com
    Home | Mission | Contact Us | Acknowledgements © 2009 Copyrights, All Rights Reserved. 
    Disclaimer Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order and other contents correctly, the access and circulation is subject to the condition that EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions. The Site is constantly updated and any or all of the contents are liable to be modified, altered, deleted or replaced. EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone whether directly or indirectly  due to any modification , alteration, addition, deletion or replacement of any of the contents.

    Copyright : Reproduction of news articles, photos, or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of  EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is prohibited.Do not copy contents of this site . All pages are protected by COPYSCAPE. Plagiarism will be detected by COPYSCAPE.