Login | Register Now | Contact Us   
 

CGST Act IGST Act UTGST Act GST (Compensation to the States) Act Addendum to the GST Rate Schedule - 03.06.2017 101st Constitution Amendment Act, 2016 Addendum to the GST Rate Schedule - 18.05.2017 GST Compensation Cess Rates Decided in the GST Council Meeting held on 18.05.2017 Chapter Wise Rate wise GST Schedule - 03.06.2017 Chapter wise GST Rate Schedule for Goods Decided in the GST Council Meeting held on 18.05.2017 Revised Threshold for Composition Scheme - 11.06.2017 IGST Exemptions Approved by the GST Council - 11.06.2017 GST Rates Approved by the GST Council - 11.06.2017 Service Tax Exemptions in GST IGST Exemption, Concession List - 03.06.2017 Composition - Rules Valuation Rules ITC - Rules Invoice, Debit & Credit Notes - Rules Payment - Rules Refund - Rules Registration - Rules Return- Rules Transition Rules Proposed CTD Document Accounts and Record Rules GST rate Schedule for Services Decisions Taken by the GST Council in the 16th Meeting - 11.06.2017 List of Services under Reverse Charge Classification Scheme for Services Under GST
Service tax refunds: Are they just or unjust?
30 September, 2010 Ahmedabad :
Service tax refunds: Are they just or unjust?

No one can be taxed without any constitutional authority. If any tax or duty is collected by the department because of misinterpretation of the provisions of law, the same can be refunded if the taxpayer applies for a refund. Refund claims can be filed with the department under many other circumstances too, such as, when the service provider finally wins a legal battle wherein he had initially deposited some service tax under departments pressure or where the provisions of the act under which the said tax was levied has been ultimately held to be unconstitutional.

Nevertheless, certain conditions have to be followed. First and foremost is the time period prescribed, which is termed as the limitation. However, even if the said condition is fulfilled, the doctrine of unjust enrichment is also to be looked into. Surprisingly, the act and rules have not been very verbose on this principal of unjust enrichment.

However, the said doctrine is a result of the apex court decision in the case of Mafatlal Industries Ltd. CEO 1996 SC 2 and is based on the principles of equity and fairness. Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as made applicable to service tax law deals with this principle. To put it simply 'Unjust Enrichment' means one party is unjustly benefited at the expense of another. Under indirect taxation, the underlying concept behind the doctrine of unjust enrichment is that the person who pays the tax to the government passes it on to his customers by including it in his sale price whether or not he mentions in invoices and so effectively, he loses nothing. Further Section 12B lays down the presumption that every person who has paid the tax, unless the contrary is proved by him, be deemed to have passed on the full incidence of such tax to the buyer. The aspect of unjust enrichment is also applicable to the tax paid under protest.

The theory of unjust enrichment is invoked based on justice preventing the assessee from retaining a benefit from the customer and at the same time claiming a refund of the amount from the Government. Such a theory would necessarily also invite the application of the countervailing theory of 'unjust impoverishment'. Which means a person should not be made liable for payment of taxes unjustly. However, department officers who are faced with targets of collection rarely observe the principal of unjust impoverishment which is counter argument of unjust enrichment.

This concept of "unjust enrichment" has been caught in legal puzzles and seems to have thoroughly lost the purpose behind its insertion. Board has the Modus operandi that the applicant should be granted a refund only after the claim is found admissible on merits as well as within time and the question of unjust enrichment is decided in his favour. A question may arise that how to decide whether the incidence has been passed on to the other person or not. The answer has to be complete on two aspects; burden of tax can be transferred directly or indirectly. If applicant includes tax in its invoices / debit notes then burden of tax is transferred directly. The indirect method is including the tax amount while arriving at pricing of services and it means that while deciding cost of service the tax portion is included and thus, burden is borne by consumers and not by the assessee.

If applicant is unable to prove that the incidence was not actually passed onto any other person then the refund amount is credited to Consumer Welfare Fund. In case the service recipient wants to claim refund of the tax burden transferred on him, which was proved to be collected without any authority, he is at liberty to do so. The overall objective of the Consumer Welfare Fund is to provide financial assistance to promote and protect the welfare of the consumers and strengthen the voluntary consumer movement particularly in the rural areas. However, it is not known to anyone out of crores of rupees of refund credited every year to the Fund, what portion, if any, is actually spent for welfare of consumers.

Service Tax Refund

Courtesy: From the desk of Monish Bhalla, Founder, www.servicetaxonline.com
Related Contents
  • Service Tax Refund
  •  
     

    www.centralexciseonline.com

     


    www.taxolegal.com


    Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


    www.customsindiaonline.com
    Home | Mission | Contact Us | Acknowledgements © 2009 Copyrights, All Rights Reserved. 
    Disclaimer Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order and other contents correctly, the access and circulation is subject to the condition that EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions. Mr Certify site is constantly updated and any or all of the contents are liable to be modified, altered, deleted or replaced. EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone whether directly or indirectly  due to any modification , alteration, addition, deletion or replacement of any of the contents.

    Copyright: Reproduction of news articles, photos, or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of  EASY SERVICETAXONLINE DOT COM PRIVATE LIMITED is prohibited.Do not copy contents of this site. All pages are protected by COPYSCAPE. Plagiarism will be detected by COPYSCAPE.